Gold Production Expected to Hit a Record High 2013

polyus gold

(Reuters) – This year gold mines yield is set to reach a record high, while gold bulls are let down for the 24% cost decline this year and they awaited production cuts.

Some gold miners have sensed the squeeze of lower charges this year, and a number, encompassing Canada’s Kinross and Russia’s Polymetal, hovering marginal mines and projects after a spectacular first-half cost fall.

But as costs fall, other ones are really expanding yield to maintain income and earnings levels. In some situations, they are aiming at higher grade ore to keep marginal mines operating and developing money, at the total cost of future output.

Furthermore, some large projects put into shift during gold’s 12-year rally, which took the yellow metal price as high as $1,920 an ounce in 2011, are coming to final result.

GFMS analyst William Tankard said that their expectation is that they’re going to see a new record high in gold mining yield this year.

He added, what they’re glimpsing is an ongoing response not to the skid in charges, but the decade-long stretch of equitably hefty capital investment into the excavation industry that preceded it.

The world’s biggest three gold miners – Barrick Gold, AngloGold Ashanti and Newmont excavation – all described higher production in the most latest quarter.

For some marginal mines, firms are designing to tap better grades up front, a practice renowned as high-grading, which often arrives at the expense of limitation the life of a task and giving up lower grade ore that could have been financial subsequent.

African Barrick Gold, for demonstration, re-engineered its lowest grade and largest cost mine, Buzwagi, to tap higher grades and move less material, hoping to ensure the procedure develops cash.

Nomura analyst Tyler Broda said that in the short period, when they have got flexibility, one can see companies changing the ore blend to keep them functioning. It charges cash to shut things down.

Costs Decline

Throughout the boom years, the cost of gold excavation soared. But this year the mean cost of making an ounce of gold is currently showing signals of retreating, according to metals consultancy Thomson Reuters GFMS.

After total cash costs fell to $769 an ounce in the second quarter of 2013 in the first three months of the year from $796, all-in costs are anticipated to ease to around $1,200 an ounce from $1,228 last year.

That is still worryingly close to the current price range of gold in the spot market at $1,270, and there is only so far miners can cut back to hold strong operations afloat. But the long hold ups and time scales in excavation signify it will take time for the drop in charges to convert into smaller mine yield, analysts said.

Miners are cranking up volumes to increase income and disperse out their hefty fixed charges over a larger groundwork, just as large new operations such as Barrick Gold’s Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic and Randgold’s Kibali mine in the Democratic Republic of Congo arrive on stream.

Metals consultancy Metals Focus says it anticipates gold mine yield to shatter through 3,000 tonnes a year in 2014 for the first time. That compares with an approximated 2013 output of 2,920 tonnes and 2012’s 2,861 tonnes, according to GFMS.

Gold production could start moderating in 2015.

Metals Focus analyst Oliver Heathman said that it’s when investors will start to see some cost-cutting closures. Depending on the mines, they can maintain a time span of high ranking. The bulk of mines are still money-making on a cash cost cornerstone at $1,000 an ounce, but not on a prolonged cornerstone.


The influence that rises and decreases of a couple of century tonnes will have on gold prices is unclear, however.

Gold’s large above-ground supplies and heavy recycling signify prime supply has less influence on prices than on those of other commodities such as platinum or copper.

GFMS’s Tankard said that we could glimpse another 500 tonnes approaching out of mining before it starts to act as a meaningful floor to the cost? I would say that we could. We glimpsed production at round 2,400 tonnes a year as recently as 2008. It’s absolutely feasible to get back to those levels.

So far, a sizeable fall in the other major part of supply, recycling – down 158.1 tonnes in the first nine months of this year – has finished little to support prices. That fall has been very strongly outweighed by anticipations that demand will stay weak.

The World Gold Council said previous this month that gold consumption this year could drop by 5-10%, possibly taking it to a four-year reduced, as investors liquidate bullion holdings and the stride of centered bank buying slows down.

For gold, which is mainly treasured as buying into vehicle, the significance of yield for cost is as much about insight as truth.

Investors could be tempted back to gold, if they believe falling mine supply can play a part in supporting prices, that’s in case demand starts to recover.

Mitsui prized Metals analyst David Jollie says, if gold production was 10% less next year, it won’t make a lot of difference. But the message it sends to investors is that the cost will not sustainably stay at reduced grades over an expanded period of time.